|
|
|
|
| ♂, Chiang Mai, Thailand. | ♂, Chiang Mai, Thailand. | ||
|
|
|
|
| ♂, Nan, Thailand. | ♂, Nan, Thailand. | ||
|
|
||
| ♂ genitalia, Chiang Mai, Thailand. | |||
| ON :
Padraona lydia Evans, 1934 OD : Entomologist 67:184. TL : Assam. (♂, NHML) Distribution : Assam, Myanmar (to Karens), Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Sichuan. |
 |
[ THAILAND ]
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Pinratana,1985 : 100, pl.34, figs.224,♂,♂(Un). (Chiang Mai; Mae Hong Son)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Katsuyama et al.,2005 : 64, fig.28,♂. (Umphang)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Ek-Amnuay,[2007] : 828, pl.380, figs.265,♂,♂(Un). (Mae Tha; Nan)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Kimura et al.,2011 : 96, figs.♂,♂(Un),♀,♀(Un). (Doi Pha Hom Pok; Doi Suthep; Doi Inthanon; Khun Lao Villege; Charn Phui; Phu Kradung; Nakohn Nayok; Kratching WF; Bang Phra; 'Than To WF.')
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Ek-Amnuay,2012 : 890, pl.412, figs.H254,♂,♂(Un). (Mae Tha; Nan)
[ LAOS ]
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Motono & Negishi,1989 : 83, pl.115, figs.B9,♂,B10,♂(Un). (PT)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Osada, Uémura & Uehara,1999 : 225, pl.142, fig.♂. (Phong Si)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Nakamura & Wakahara,2012 : 60.
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Onodera,2022 : 120, pl.257, figs.♂,♂(Un). (Xiengkhouang: Phou Samsoum)
[ VIETNAM ]
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Devyatkin & Monastyrskii,1999 : 175. (by literature)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Devyatkin,2000 : 202. (S: Da Lat)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Devyatkin & Monastyrskii,2002 : 150. (Ngoc Linh)
Potanthus lydia lydia ; Monastyrskii & Devyatkin,2015 : 83. (N / C: to Lam Dong)
[ THAILAND ]
Chiang Mai : 6♂.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
The butterfly is locally common in montane forests at moderate to high elevations (Alt. 900 - 1600m).
Males are territorial on shrubs or undergrowth.
Kimura et al.,2011 recorded this taxon from Than To, Yala, but this is rather doubtful.
If this record is correct, it could be ssp.fraseri.
The specimen identity needs to be reconfirmed.
The species of this genus are so similar that identification by male genitalia is required.
Therefore, records that do not examine the male genitalia cannot be adopted.
In addition, although there are many field photos, most are either misidentified or unidentifiable and therefore cannot be used as records.
Evans, W.H.,1934 : Indo-Australian Hesperiidae: Description of new Genera, Species and Subspecies.
Entomologist 67(2):33-36 (part.1), (3):61-65 (part.2), (7):141-151 (part.3), (8):181-184 (part.4), (9): 206-209 (part.5), (10): 231-234 (part.6).
2018.05.31 - 2023.10.31.
|